USPTO serial 79045621
NEFISSO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3583520Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 3, 2009
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEFISSO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
NEFIS KURUYEMIS SEKERLEME GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by NEFIS KURUYEMIS SEKERLEME GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
NEFIS KURUYEMIS SEKERLEME GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by NEFIS KURUYEMIS SEKERLEME GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
NEFIS KURUYEMIS SEKERLEME GIDA SANAYI V E TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by NEFIS KURUYEMIS SEKERLEME GIDA SANAYI V E TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried beans, dried chickpeas, dried lentils, dried soy beans, dried peas; processed and roasted nuts, processed and roasted pistachio, processed and roasted almonds, processed and roasted peanuts, processed and roasted chickpeas, processed and roasted pumpkin seeds; peanut butter, hazelnut butter, tahini; potato chips, potato crisps, potato fritters | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cemal Karpuz
- Other trademarks owned by NEFIS KURUYEMIS SEKERLEME GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by NEFIS KURUYEMIS SEKERLEME GIDA; SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by NEFIS KURUYEMIS SEKERLEME GIDA SANAYI V E TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named NEFISSO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2021 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |