Drawing for XTRAFLEX

USPTO serial 79045634

XTRAFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3564851Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 20, 2009
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with XTRAFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1397 Carroll DriveAtlanta, GA 30318UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017FLEXIBLE PIPES, NOT OF METAL, FOR USE IN HYDRAULIC APPLICATIONS; REINFORCED RUBBER PIPES, FLEXIBLE PLASTIC PIPES AND PLASTIC HOSES FOR HYDRAULIC APPARATUS AND FLUID CONVEYING APPLICATIONS; HYDRAULIC HOSES MADE OF REINFORCED RUBBER AND PLASTIC; REINFORCED RUBBER HOSES AND TUBES MADE OF RUBBER FOR HYDRAULIC APPLIANCES AND FLUID CONVEYING APPLICATIONS; RUBBER TUBES AND HOSES FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF HYDRAULICSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 18, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 8, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 2, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 13, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 20, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance