Drawing for MAGILINE

USPTO serial 79045640

MAGILINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3591375Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 17, 2009
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGILINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Civil engineering structures, namely, storage basins in the nature of non-metal in-ground sewage and water run-off basins; non-metal swimming pools; non-metallic building materials to building civil engineering structures, namely, storage basins in the nature of non-metal in-ground sewage and water run-off basins; non-metal composite sheeting and panels for making watertight walls; non-metallic panels forming casings for building swimming pools; non-metallic protective fitted covers for swimming pools; non-metallic shutters for swimming pools; non-metallic gates, fences and grates for swimming pools; non-metallic steps for swimming poolsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 10, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 24, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 23, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 23, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 5, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 14, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance