Drawing for LAUREN VIDAL

USPTO serial 79045667

LAUREN VIDAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3612568Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 28, 2009
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LAUREN VIDAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian Beverly

Brian Beverly BEESON SKINNER BEVERLY, LLPOne Kaiser Plaza, Suite 750OAKLAND, CA 94612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018[ Leather and imitation leather; animal skins, hides, trunks and suitcases; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips and saddlery; wallets, purses not of precious metal; ] handbags [, backpacks, wheeled duffle, messenger and tote bags, carry-all bags for climbers and campers, travelling bags, beach bags, unfitted vanity cases; collars or clothing for animals; mesh shopping bags, leather bags for merchandise packaging ]ACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, [ bathing suits, bath robes, bathing trunks, overalls, ] teddies, [ collar protectors, ] shirts, [ jumpers, ] chemisettes, shawls, [ suits, ] outer clothing, namely, coats; [ gabardines, waistcoats, ] vest, raincoats, skirts, [ petticoats, coats, ] pants, [ topcoats, overcoats, ] parkas, pullovers, [ pajamas, ] dresses, tee-shirts, knitwear, namely, [ shirts, coats, vest, skirts, ] dresses pullovers; jackets [, clothing for gymnastics, namely, leotards; Footwear; Headgear, namely, hats, caps and head wear; Leather and imitation leather clothing, namely, suits, gabardines, waistcoats, vest, raincoats, skirts, teddies, coats, pants, topcoats, overcoats, parkas, dresses and jackets; belts, Fur clothing, namely, stoles, coats and jackets; gloves; ] scarves [ ; ties; hosiery; socks; slippers; beach, ski or sports footwear; textile nappies; underwear ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2020INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Dec 25, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 25, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 10, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 14, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 12, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 4, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 4, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 4, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 4, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 20, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance