USPTO serial 79045717
BRILLIANTPEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3527742Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2008
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRILLIANTPEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dyes and contrast media for medical use in the field of ophthalmology, namely, contrast media for intraocular use in marking biological tissues | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 4, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |