Drawing for LUIS JOHN

USPTO serial 79045718

LUIS JOHN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUIS JOHN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys, and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, not included in other classes, namely, jewelry boxes and cases for watches; jewelry; precious stones; and horological and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, coats, jeans, dresses, T-shirts, sweaters; leather clothing, namely, pants, coats, jackets; ties, gabardine pants, gloves, socks; beach clothes, namely, beach shoes, bath sandals, bath slippers, bathing caps; footwear; and headgear, namely, headwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 19, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 10, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance