Drawing for MPOD MOBILE PRINTING ON DEMAND

USPTO serial 79045731

MPOD MOBILE PRINTING ON DEMAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3718683Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 1, 2009
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MPOD MOBILE PRINTING ON DEMAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Stachniak

Jennifer Stachniak Johnson, Marcou & Isaacs, LLC317A East Liberty StreetSavannah, GA 31401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing telecommunications connections to mobile printer stationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Installation, maintenance and updating and enhancements and further development of printer software; hardware and software consultancy for printers, software consultancy for mobile printer stations; telecommunications engineering consultancy, * exclusively in connection with mobile printing * namely, consultation in the field of implementing printer software; design and development of printer softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 18, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 7, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 30, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2014INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 27, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 21, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 20, 2012LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2012COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 20, 2012PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jun 29, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 18, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 1, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 27, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 15, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 2, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance