Drawing for LUCI

USPTO serial 79045808

LUCI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUCI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for recording, playing and transfer of sound and imagesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038Telecommunication services, transfer of sound and imagesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 29, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 30, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 2, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 2, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance