USPTO serial 79045819
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart L Gitler
Stewart L Gitler WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC1451 Dolley Madison Blvd.Suite 210McLean, VA 22101| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers, namely, wines, sparkling wines, sweet wines [ ; distilled spirits made from grapes, namely, grappas, spirits, schnapps and grape distillates ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |