Drawing for ECOAT M ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY

USPTO serial 79045851

ECOAT M ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3567861Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 27, 2009
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOAT M ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne M. Sterba

G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K STREET NWSUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL PIPES, FLEXIBLE METAL PIPES, METAL TUBE SOCKETS, METAL PIPE FITTINGS, PIPE UNIONS MADE OF METAL, METAL PIPE COUPLINGS AND JOINTS, TUBES OF METAL, METAL FLANGES, METAL ADAPTOR FITTINGS, RING SHAPED FITTINGS OF METAL, METAL CATCHES FOR METAL PIPES, METAL SAFES, METAL ORES, NAMELY, COPPER ORES, IRON ORES, LEAD ORES, NICKEL ORES, TIN ORES AND ZINC ORES; METAL CABLE WIRESECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
017FLEXIBLE PIPES, NOT OF METAL, FOR USE IN HYDRAULIC APPLICATIONS; REINFORCED RUBBER PIPES; FLEXIBLE PIPES AND HOSES MADE OF PLASTIC FOR HYDRAULIC APPARATUS AND FLUID CONVEYING APPLICATIONS; HYDRAULIC HOSES MADE OF REINFORCED RUBBER AND PLASTIC AND TUBES MADE OF RUBBER FOR HYDRAULIC APPLIANCES AND FLUID CONVEYING APPLICATIONS; RUBBER TUBES AND HOSES FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF HYDRAULICSSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2018UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 19, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 18, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 28, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 28, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 1, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 8, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 27, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance