USPTO serial 79045916
ELO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, namely, forks and spoons | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils, namely, bakeware (not toys), baking dishes, basting spoons, brushes for basting meat, cheese graters, kitchen ladles, colanders for household use, cooking pans, cooking pots, cooking pots and pans (non-electric) , cooking sieves and sifters, cooking steamers, cooking strainers, cookware, namely, pots and pans, cookware, namely, roasting pans,frying pans, garlic presses, glass pans, griddles (non-electric), household containers for foods,household utensils, namely, graters, sieves, spatulas, strainers, turners, pot and pan scrapers, rolling pins, spatulas, turners, whisks, skimmers, kettles (non-electric), ladles for kitchen use, rolling pins (for cooking purposes), squeegees for dishes, utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs, turners, and containers for food not of precious metal or coated therewith, combs and scrubbing scouring and cleaning sponges and sponges for household purposes; bath, clothes, cosmetic, dusting, floor, hair, make-up, nail, pet, scrubbing, shoe, toilet and tooth brushes not including paint brushes, brooms; material for brush-making; cleaning material, namely, abrasive pads for kitchen or domestic purposes, cleaning, dusting and polishing cloths and cleaning pads, steel wool, unworked or semi-worked glass except building glass, cooking pot sets, thermally insulated household containers for food and beverages, bottle gourds, non-electric portable coolers, tableware, namely, beverageware, bowls, bread baskets for domestic use, butter dishes, casserole dishes, coasters not of paper and not being table linen, coffee cups, tea cups and mugs, creamer pitchers, cruet stands for oil or vinegar not of precious metal, cups and mugs, dinnerware, drinking cups and glasses, goblets, gravy boats, lazy susans, oven to table racks, pasta serving forks, pepper grinders, sugar bowls and salt shakers, pitchers, plates, porcelain mugs, salad bowls, salt and pepper mills, salt and pepper shakers, saucers, serving bowls, serving dishes, serving forks, serving ladles, serving spoons, serving tongs, servingware for serving food, soup tureens, stemware, sugar bowls, teacups, trivets, wine glasses and wine buckets, watering devices, namely, watering cans and pots, buckets, garden hose sprayers, lawn sprinklers,' gloves for household purposes, chamois leather for cleaning leather for cleaning purposes, corkscrews, bottle openers, metal boxes for dispensing paper towels, soap dispensers, clothes drying racks, refuse bins, insect traps, shaving brushes, toothbrushes, toothpicks,' cosmetic utensils, namely, combs, compacts containing dental floss and also including lip gloss, compacts sold empty, cotton ball dispensers, cotton balls, dental floss, exfoliating pads, microderm abrasion sponges for cosmetic use, powder puffs, power-operated brush used to clean and exfoliate the skin, facial sponges for applying make-up, sponges for applying body powder, stencils for applying makeup, eyebrow brushes, eyelash formers, toiletry sets comprised of body brushes, combs, compacts sold empty, cosmetic and make-up brushes, bath products, namely, sea, loofah and body sponges | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |