USPTO serial 79045918
Q
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3845331Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2010
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with Q?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric T. Fingerhut
Eric T. Fingerhut Dykema Gossett PLLC1301 K Str., N.W., Suite 1100Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines, namely, conveyors used for material and product transport | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |