Drawing for AS DO MAR

USPTO serial 79045934

AS DO MAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3580663Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 24, 2009
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AS DO MAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Himich

Matthew J. Himich Thompson Coburn LLPOne US Bank PlazaSt. Louis, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029[ Meat, ] fish, [ poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 28, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Mar 18, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 18, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jan 22, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Jan 22, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 21, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 21, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 4, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 4, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 1, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 24, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 24, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 26, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 25, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 23, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 24, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 8, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 4, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 11, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance