USPTO serial 79045940
ANTARCTICINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3598622Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 31, 2009
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ANTARCTICINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Teresan W. Gilbert
Teresan W. Gilbert The Lubrizol Corporation29400 Lakeland BoulevardWickliffe, OH 44092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS FOR THE COSMETICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, NAMELY, CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF [ PHARMACEUTICALS AND ] COSMETICS | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | [ CLEANING, POLISHING, SCOURING AND ABRASIVE LIQUIDS AND POWDERS; SOAPS FOR PERSONAL USE, PERFUMERY; ESSENTIAL OILS, COSMETICS, HAIR LOTIONS; DENTIFRICES ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | [ PHARMACEUTICAL AND VETERINARY PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OR CARE OF THE SKIN; HYGIENIC PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, DISINFECTANTS FOR HYGIENE PURPOSES AND FEMININE HYGIENE PADS; DIETETIC FOODS ADAPTED FOR MEDICAL USE; FOOD FOR BABIES; MEDICAL PLASTERS; MATERIALS FOR DRESSING WOUNDS, NAMELY, BANDAGES, GAUZE, STOCKINGS, SOCKS, GLOVES AND SLEEVES; MATERIAL FOR STOPPING TEETH AND DENTAL WAX; DISINFECTANTS FOR SANITARY PURPOSES; ALL-PURPOSE DISINFECTANTS; PREPARATIONS FOR DESTROYING VERMIN; FUNGICIDES, HERBICIDES ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LIPOTEC, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by LIPOTEC, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by LIPOTEC, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ANTARCTICINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |