Drawing for SAXO

USPTO serial 79045946

SAXO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3557722Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 6, 2009
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SAXO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue, 10th FloorNew York, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035[ Online ordering services featuring computer hardware and software via a global computer network; administrative services in support of legal services, namely, secretarial services, legal docketing management services, and secretarial and legal docketing management services in the areas of notarial and legalization ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
036Financial analysis and information, banking, and stocks and bonds brokerage services; financial services, namely, financial consultation, financial investment services in the field of securities, annuities, bonds, [ certificates of deposite, ]defined portfolios, futures, commodities, insurance, mutual funds, hedgefunds, stocks, options, and other securities and derivatives, and financial brokerage services in the nature of mutual fund, security and stock brokerage services [, issuance of credit cards, credit card services ]ACTIVE—
042[ Design and development of computer hardware and software tools for use in connection with financial trading on the Internet ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 1, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 25, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 15, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 25, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 4, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 16, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 1, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 23, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 23, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2015C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 23, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 29, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 23, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 6, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 2, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 5, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 5, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance