Drawing for WEBANIZING

USPTO serial 79045959

WEBANIZING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBANIZING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software, in particular software for individualising webpages and homepages, for linking webpages on a specific other webpage, for integrating content on a webpage, for displaying individual user content on a webpage, and software for distributing content within a user group on the InternetSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Product advertising through presentation of web designs, web developments, webpages, webtools on the Internet and other media, in the field of graphic design and layout, webtools in the financial analysis sector, webtools in the field of webpage individualisation, webtools in the field of the inserting or summarising of web content, webtools in the field of content managementSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
038TelecommunicationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Education; providing of training; entertainmentSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Design and development of computer hardware and software; design, development, installation and providing of web software, in particular for displaying individualised webpages and homepages on the InternetSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 12, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 24, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 5, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 8, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 20, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance