USPTO serial 79045968
PURELOSOPHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3757671Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2010
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURELOSOPHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | NON ALCOHOLIC CARBONATED AND NON CARBONATED BEVERAGES; FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES [; SYRUPS FOR MAKING BEVERAGES CONTAINING FRUIT JUICES AND BOTANICAL EXTRACTS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by purelosophy AG, c/o Ornitag Treuhand AG
- Other trademarks owned by purelosophy AG, c/o Ornitag Treuhand AG
- Other trademarks owned by purelosophy AG
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PURELOSOPHY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 29, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |