USPTO serial 79045982
ASCENTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3492973Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2008
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASCENTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine J. Holland
Catherine J. Holland KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Printing ink; ink cartridge for ink-jet printer, computer printer, photocopier, facsimile machine, video printer, bar code printer, word processor | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by General Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by General Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by General Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named ASCENTA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |