Drawing for WATERWAND

USPTO serial 79046008

WATERWAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATERWAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines and machine tools; cleaning apparatus and instruments including apparatus for cleaning swimming pool and spa filters and other filtering machines and apparatus; cleaning apparatus for the de-contamination, purification and cleaning of fluid filtration systems; parts of, and fittings and accessories for, the aforesaid goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 20, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 2, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 31, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance