Drawing for IDENTIPHI

USPTO serial 79046042

IDENTIPHI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3508977Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 30, 2008
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDENTIPHI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Franklin Rothwell

G. Franklin Rothwell Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc1425 K Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and computer hardware for management and security of computer systems and computer networks being computer hardware and computer software for identity authentication, biometric authenticationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 5, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 17, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 5, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 5, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 1, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 1, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 7, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 22, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 31, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 8, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 18, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 18, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 7, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Dec 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance