Drawing for VCS

USPTO serial 79046088

VCS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3591378Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 17, 2009
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with VCS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly A. Berger

Kimberly A. Berger Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, PLC150 West JeffersonSuite 2500Detroit, MI 48226

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultancy, in particular consultancy and support with regard to the development of strategies and the optimisation of technical business processes; advertising; business management services; organization consultancy; management consultancy; business consultancy and advisory services; business administration; office functions; remuneration consultancy; personnel consultancy; search for, and selection of, managerial and other staff; drawing up of statistics; bookkeeping; business investigations; marketing, market research and market analysis; organisation of trade fairs and exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposesACTIVE—
041Tuition and training services in the fields of business matters, information technology, management, optimising development processes and development of strategies, optimising technical business processes; conducting seminars, further training events, conferences and workshops in the fields of business matters, information technology, management, optimising development processes and development of strategies, optimising technical business processes; providing of training in the fields of business matters, information technology, management, optimising development processes and development of strategies, optimizing technical business processes; publication of books, newspapers and periodicalsACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto in the fields of software, hardware, systems technology, IT and industry technology and technical product development * for the automotive industry *; industrial analysis and research services in the fields of software, hardware, systems technology, IT and industry technology and technical product development * for the automotive industry *; optimisation of technical development processes in the fields of software, hardware, systems technology, IT and industry technology and technical product development * for the automotive industry; all of the aforementioned services expressly exclude the area of electronic design automation *ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 5, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 25, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2019ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 17, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 24, 2014NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 201415AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Oct 24, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 24, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 15, 201415AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Oct 15, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2014E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2009COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 11, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
May 11, 2009LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 10, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 25, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance