USPTO serial 79046088
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vector Consulting Services GmbH
Stuttgart, DE
Vector Consulting Services GmbH
Stuttgart, DE
Vector Consulting Services GmbH
Stuttgart, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly A. Berger
Kimberly A. Berger Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, PLC150 West JeffersonSuite 2500Detroit, MI 48226| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultancy, in particular consultancy and support with regard to the development of strategies and the optimisation of technical business processes; advertising; business management services; organization consultancy; management consultancy; business consultancy and advisory services; business administration; office functions; remuneration consultancy; personnel consultancy; search for, and selection of, managerial and other staff; drawing up of statistics; bookkeeping; business investigations; marketing, market research and market analysis; organisation of trade fairs and exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Tuition and training services in the fields of business matters, information technology, management, optimising development processes and development of strategies, optimising technical business processes; conducting seminars, further training events, conferences and workshops in the fields of business matters, information technology, management, optimising development processes and development of strategies, optimising technical business processes; providing of training in the fields of business matters, information technology, management, optimising development processes and development of strategies, optimizing technical business processes; publication of books, newspapers and periodicals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto in the fields of software, hardware, systems technology, IT and industry technology and technical product development * for the automotive industry *; industrial analysis and research services in the fields of software, hardware, systems technology, IT and industry technology and technical product development * for the automotive industry *; optimisation of technical development processes in the fields of software, hardware, systems technology, IT and industry technology and technical product development * for the automotive industry; all of the aforementioned services expressly exclude the area of electronic design automation * | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2009 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2008 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |