Drawing for COSIC

USPTO serial 79046097

COSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3516701Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 14, 2008
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine M. Basile

Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Reed Smith Docketing DepartmentPittsburgh, PA 15230

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Microprocessors; semiconductors; integrated circuit chips; integrated circuit boards; operating software for electronic components, microprocessors, semiconductors, chips and integrated circuit boardsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 7, 2020IRIVIRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 12, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 17, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 17, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 14, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 9, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 4, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 6, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 31, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 25, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 29, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 5, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance