USPTO serial 79046104
LADIES WHO SHOOT THEIR LUNCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3472640Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LADIES WHO SHOOT THEIR LUNCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Scott Gerien
J. Scott Gerien Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty1500 First Street, Ste 200Napa, CA 94559UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PLUNKETT-FOWLES PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by PLUNKETT-FOWLES PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by PLUNKETT-FOWLES PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Fowles Wine Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named LADIES WHO SHOOT THEIR LUNCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |