USPTO serial 79046110
VITTORIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3660993Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 28, 2009
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITTORIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-24040 Madone (BG), IT
I-24040 Madone (BG), IT
IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francesco Braga
Francesco Braga PERANI & PARTNERS S.P.A.Piazza Armando Diaz 7MILANO,ITALYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Chemicals used in industry and science; photographic chemical preparations; chemical preparations for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, namely, chemical preparations for the treatment of seeds; unprocessed artificial resins, unprocessed plastics for industrial use; manures; fire extinguishing compositions; metal tampering and soldering chemicals; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; tanning agents for use in the manufacture of leather; adhesives for industrial use ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | [ Automobiles; ] apparatus for locomotion by land, [ air, and water, ] namely, bicycles [, airplanes and boats ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 28, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 23, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 21, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |