Drawing for MIMESIS

USPTO serial 79046130

MIMESIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3570181Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 3, 2009
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIMESIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

REBECCAH GAN

REBECCAH GAN YOUNG & THOMPSON209 Madison St., Ste. 500Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cartography and geolocalization software; software for geographic and cartographic modeling, navigation and guidance; teleguidance apparatus, also known as a global positioning system; graphical user interface software; data processing and computer equipment in the field of cartographySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 19, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 4, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 4, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 6, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 12, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 3, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 14, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance