Drawing for VECTOR CONSULTING SERVICES

USPTO serial 79046176

VECTOR CONSULTING SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3767509Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 30, 2010
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with VECTOR CONSULTING SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly A. Berger

Kimberly A. Berger Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, PLC150 West JeffersonSuite 2500Detroit, MI 48226

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultancy; consultancy and support in developing strategies and optimising technical business processes; advertising; business management; organisation consultancy; management consultancy; professional business consultancy; business administration; office functions; personnel consultancy; personnel consultancy in the field of staff remuneration; search and selection of managerial and other staff; statistics for business or commercial purposes; book-keeping; business investigations; marketing, market studies and market analysis; organisation of trade fairs and exhibitions for commercial and advertising purposesACTIVE—
041Tuition and training services in the fields of business matters, information technology, management, optimising development processes and development of strategies, optimising technical business processes; conducting seminars, further training events, conferences and workshops in the fields of business matters, information technology, management, optimising development processes and development of strategies, optimising technical business processes; providing of training in the fields of business matters, information technology, management, optimising development processes and development of strategies, optimizing technical business processes; publication of books, newspapers and periodicalsACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto in the fields of software, hardware, systems technology, IT and industry technology and technical product development; industrial analysis and research services in the fields of software, hardware, systems technology, IT and industry technology and technical product development; optimisation of technical development processes in the fields of software, hardware, systems technology, IT and industry technology and technical product developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 5, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 1, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 8, 2016TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jul 8, 2016CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 8, 2016CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Mar 14, 2016PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 13, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 13, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 2, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 30, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 10, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 24, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance