Drawing for N'ICE CHOUFFE

USPTO serial 79046237

N'ICE CHOUFFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3543802Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 9, 2008
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with N'ICE CHOUFFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers, namely, ale, lager, stoutACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 17, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 9, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 1, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 29, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 4, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 18, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 18, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 8, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Sep 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 17, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance