Drawing for SMART [DRINKS]

USPTO serial 79046243

SMART [DRINKS]

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART [DRINKS]?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allyn Taylor, Esq.

Allyn Taylor DLA Piper US LLP2000 University AvenueEast Palo Alto, CA 94303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, bottled drinking water, energy drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups for beverages; preparations for making beverages in the nature of fruit juices, energy drinks and mineral watersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 7, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 21, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 27, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 27, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 27, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 20, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 14, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 13, 2009OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2009OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Aug 11, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 5, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 4, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance