USPTO serial 79046256
SECUROS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECUROS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary products and preparations for the treatment of diseases, namely, skincare and eye diseases, to be distributed in nano solutions; filling materials for teeth and dental casting material; all purpose disinfectants; ceramics for teeth and bones and bone cement with or without pharmaceutically active ingredients for orthopaedic and surgical applications; dental cement; biological preparations for human medical purposes; metal ceramics for use as teeth and bone filling material; dental ceramics for use as teeth and bone filling material; anesthetics, namely, local anesthetics, topical anesthetics; antiseptics; antibiotics; pharmaceutical ingredients, namely, antibacterial pharmaceuticals and astringents; dietetic products, namely, dietetic food and sugar for medical use; mineral food supplements; baby food; contrast medium for medical use; styptics, namely, styptic pencils; medical vulnerary sponges; medical plasters; bandaging materials, namely, bandages for dressing, skin wounds, adhesive bandages | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Surgical implants comprising artificial materials; implants, namely, bone implants and jaw implants composed of artificial materials; artificial limbs, eyes, and teeth; prostheses for limb, breast, hand, and dental prostheses; ceramic implants, namely, orthopaedic joint implants, for dentistry, and bones; bone cement application devices; orthopaedic products, namely, artificial bones for implantation; surgical sewing materials; surgical sponges; and instruments for surgical and dental use, in particular medical saws, pumps, pins and wires | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by aap Biomaterials GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by aap Biomaterials GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by aap Biomaterials GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named SECUROS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2008 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |