Drawing for DINER DES TSARS

USPTO serial 79046356

DINER DES TSARS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3673105Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 25, 2009
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DINER DES TSARS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPOne Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education, namely, providing classes, seminars and workshops in the field of gastronomy and food and wine tasting; providing of training in the field of gastronomy, oenology and wine; entertainment in the nature of musical and dance performances; cultural activities in the nature of food and wine tasting; arranging of culinary and food and wine tasting competitions for education or entertainment purposes; organization, production, presentation and conducting of colloquiums, conferences, congresses and seminars in the fields of gastronomy, oenology and wine; organization, production, presentation and conducting of events in the nature of food and wine tastings, musical and dance performances; organization, production, presentation and conducting of culinary, gastronomic and artistic events in the nature of food and wine tastings, musical and dance performances; organization, production, presentation and conducting of musical, dance and theatrical shows, balls, concerts, theatrical and musical performances; arranging and conducting of award ceremonies; party planning; technical consultancy and assistance in the field of gastronomy events, namely, food and wine tastingsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
043Restaurant services; restaurants, bars, cafe-restaurants, cafeterias, tasting rooms; catering services; rental of meeting rooms; rental of chairs, tables, table linen and glasswareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 11, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 12, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 23, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 1, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 1, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 25, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 9, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 14, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2008GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 17, 2008GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 17, 2008CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 14, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 12, 2008ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Aug 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 4, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 4, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance