USPTO serial 79046491
Serial No. 79046491
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79046491?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FI-11120 Riihimäki, FI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | heat exchangers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 25, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |