USPTO serial 79046504
LIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3669475Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 18, 2009
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J. BELLUS
STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys for further manufacturing; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks, namely, rails, fastening devices, namely, nuts, bolts, screws, and threaded fasteners; non electrical cables wires of common metal; iron mongery and small items of metal hardware, namely, namely, pulleys, springs, nuts and washers and structural and replacement parts for the aforementioned goods; pipes and tubes of metal; goods of common metal as far as included in this class, namely, metal pipe connectors, metal pipe muffs, and fastening devices, namely, nuts, bolts, screws, and threaded fasteners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |