USPTO serial 79046506
POWERTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3683243Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 2009
- Examiner
- KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AKLAR OTOMOTIV; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by AKLAR OTOMOTIV; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
AKLAR OTOMOTIV; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by AKLAR OTOMOTIV; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
AKTAS HAVA SÜSPANSIYON SISTEMLERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by AKTAS HAVA SÜSPANSIYON SISTEMLERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
AKTAS HAVA SÜSPANSIYON SISTEMLERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by AKTAS HAVA SÜSPANSIYON SISTEMLERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Rubber, namely, crude rubber, foam rubber; gutta-percha; elastomer, namely, synthetic elastomer resin blended with additives and colorants sold in a pellet form; plastics, namely, semi-processed plastics; resins, namely, resins in extruded form for general industrial use; products made from the aforesaid materials, namely, resin-based sealants for use on roofs, walls and pavements; seals, namely, grout sealant; packing materials for forming seals; extrusions and coatings, namely, vinyl extrusions used in the manufacture of windows; carbon fiber and activated carbon materials other than for textile use; sound proofing and sound-absorbing and attenuating coatings and materials, namely, sound-absorbing flooring underlayment; thermal insulation products and materials, namely, building insulation; vibration insulation and isolation products and materials, namely, insulating paint; electrical insulators, namely, electrical insulating tape; hoses, namely, fire hoses, garden hoses; pipes, namely, flexible pipes not of metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AKLAR OTOMOTIV; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by AKLAR OTOMOTIV; SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by AKTAS HAVA SÜSPANSIYON SISTEMLERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by AKTAS HAVA SÜSPANSIYON SISTEMLERI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named POWERTECH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |