Drawing for BLUE RIBBON

USPTO serial 79046528

BLUE RIBBON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUE RIBBON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BREWSTER TAYLOR

BREWSTER TAYLOR STITES & HARBISON, PLLC1199 NORTH FAIRFAX STREETSUITE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1437

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033GinSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 4, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 11, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 19, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 21, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 21, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 28, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 10, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 25, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 28, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 26, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 25, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance