USPTO serial 79046535
CATWALK KATZENKRATZBAUMSYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3631503Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 2, 2009
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CATWALK KATZENKRATZBAUMSYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter A. Chiabotti
Peter A. Chiabotti Akerman LLPP.O. Box 3188West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3188UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sieringer, Sven
- Other trademarks owned by Sieringer, Sven
- Other trademarks owned by Stöwer, Jens
- Other trademarks owned by Stöwer, Jens
- Other trademarks owned by Stöwer, Jens
- Other trademarks owned by Sieringer, Sven
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named CATWALK KATZENKRATZBAUMSYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 9, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |