Drawing for CPR

USPTO serial 79046536

CPR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3595016Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 24, 2009
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CPR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Burton S. Ehrlich

Burton S. Ehrlich Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Chocolates; pralines; chocolate truffles; cocoa products, namely, cocoa, cocoa mixes, cocoa spreads and cocoa powder; fondant confectionery; marrons glacés candy; fruit jelly confectionery; candy sweets and toffees; chocolate-covered candied orange peel; pastries; cakes; frozen confectionery; biscuits; ice creams; honey; golden table and pancake syrup; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based; cocoa-based beveragesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 18, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 12, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 30, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 30, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 21, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 24, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 6, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 28, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2008CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 8, 2008CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 15, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 31, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 30, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance