USPTO serial 79046544
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
Douglas R. Wolf Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.600 Atlantic AvenueBoston, MA 02210UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and installations for the production and processing of metal, namely, machines and installations for processing, melting, casting, handling and conveying of metal, namely, continuous and discontinuous metal casting machines, machines for separating castings and sand; machines and installations for processing, melting, casting, handling and conveying of metal, namely, vibrating, rotating and hooking installations comprising vibration chutes, belt and screw conveyers, mixers and grinding mills; machines and installations for processing, melting, casting, handling and conveying of metal, namely, sand plants for storage or regeneration comprising sand coolers, separators, and cast iron coolers; heat recovery systems, namely, heat exchangers and heat pipes; [ metal working machines; ] after cooler installations, namely, cooling towers and dry air coolers; sewage sludge combustion machines for energy recovery thermal treatment; desulphurization machines; spray cooling machines for use in gas cooling; [ solid bed adsorbers for the separation of impurities such as heavy metals, dioxins and furanes; ] dedusting installations as parts of machines; pulverized coal injection machines; coal drying and grinding or crushing machines; recycling machines, namely, machines for the mechanical recycling of foundry sand, copper, sludge dust, [ and ore dust; coking plants, namely, coal handling, coal transportation and coal grinding, drying, charging and cooling; ] conveyors; lifting installations for the transport of people, material and goods; replacement parts therefore | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Surveying instruments; photographic apparatus, namely, cameras and software for measuring systems; weighing apparatus and instruments; measuring instruments, namely, distance measuring apparatus, material and combustible consumption measuring apparatus; [ checking apparatus and instruments, namely, unloading check valves for outlets of air compressors; ] computer software for automation and instrumentation of machines and installations for processing, melting, founding, conveying and handling of metal, and computer software for measuring systems; [ calculating machines; ] data processing equipment and computers [ ; fire-extinguishing apparatus ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific development; technological services, namely, technology development, supervision and inspection in the field of processing, melting, founding, conveying and handling of metal; engineering services; industrial analysis and research services, namely, industrial research in the field of processing, melting, conveying and handling of metal; design and development of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |