Drawing for TROOP

USPTO serial 79046592

TROOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLSEN, EMILY K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TROOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitations leather and goods made of the aforesaid materials; luggage; trunks and suitcases; cases, bags and travelling bag; holdalls, rucksacks, backpacks, shoulder bags, handbags, sports bags, bumbags; toilet bags and vanity cases; briefcases, attache case; satchels, portfolio cases, carry bag; belts; purses, wallets and coin cases; card and credit card casesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 2, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 22, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 16, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 1, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance