USPTO serial 79046598
LUPUSTAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUPUSTAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry, science, agriculture, horticulture and forestry; unprocessed artificial resins; manures; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; chemical substances for use in the food industry or in the fermentation process; plant extracts, in particular extracts of hops and their derivates for controlling bacteria in the food industry, in particular in the yeast industry, for preserving foodstuffs as well as for use in the food industry or in the fermentation process, included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations; sanitary preparations for medical purposes; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, food for babies; plasters, materials for dressings; material for stopping teeth and dental impression materials; disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides; additives for preventing the formation of microorganisms during the production of yeast; hop based products, namely extracts of hops and their derivates for pharmaceutical purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals; bread, pastry and confectionery, edible ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder, salt, mustard, vinegar, sauces (condiments), spices, ice, for refreshment | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Hops and hop cones; plant extracts, in particular extracts of hops and their derivates for controlling bacteria in the food industry, in particular in the yeast industry, for preserving foodstuffs as well as for use in the food industry or in the fermentation process, included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |