Drawing for K24

USPTO serial 79046612

K24

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3516712Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 14, 2008
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with K24?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William D. Breneman

William D. Breneman BRENEMAN & GEORGES3150 COMMONWEALTH AVENUEALEXANDRIA, VA 22305UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric bowl cutter knives, namely, bowl cutter knives for boiled sausage, for dry sausage and for fine emulsion, machine tools for use in precision clamping, namely, bowl cutter clamping heads, parts of bowl cutter clamping heads, namely, profile sleeves [, spacers, initial disks, intermediate disks, end disks, balancing filling plates, standard filling plates and balancing rings ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 2021PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED—
Oct 14, 2021APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 11, 2021NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2021C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 11, 2021REINREINSTATED—
Jul 3, 2021TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 9, 2018715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 9, 2018MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 16, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Aug 16, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 16, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 30, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 30, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 15, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 11, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2007ZZBXALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION—
Dec 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance