Drawing for SNØFRISK

USPTO serial 79046617

SNØFRISK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNØFRISK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carole F. Barrett

Carole F. Barrett Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk et alThree Embarcadero7th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029cheeseSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 4, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 5, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 30, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 28, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 17, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance