USPTO serial 79046689
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew A. Pater
Matthew A. Pater Pfizer Inc.Five Giralda FarmsMadison, NJ 07940UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, non-medicated skin care preparations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | medical and surgical dressings; medical dressings for veterinary and dental use; medicated haemostatic powders for controlling bleeding and treating burns; medicinal herbal preparations to improve the softness and thickness of skin, hair, and nails; medicinal herbal preparations to counteract drying and formation of wrinkles; natural medicinal herbal preparations to treat and prevent pain in joints and limbs; medicinal herbal preparations to stimulate the immune system; medicinal herbal preparations to counteract light sensitivity to the skin and eyes and to prevent and cure tired and dry eyes; food supplements for healthcare and medical purposes derived from plant or animal ingredients; vitamin and mineral preparations; dietetic foods adapted for medical use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2024 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |