Drawing for ZIRCOCEM

USPTO serial 79046786

ZIRCOCEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3576364Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 17, 2009
Examiner
ESTRADA, LINDA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZIRCOCEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George W Lewis

GEORGE W LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dental cements; dental etching agents; adhesives for dentures; dental adhesives; bonding and priming materials for dental purposes; dental abrasives; dental waxes; molding waxes for dentists; dental impression materials; artificial tooth materials; dental gypsums; dental composite resins; dental investment materials; dental fillings; tooth filling materials; dental relining materials; dental lining materials; dental tissue conditioners; oxy barrier agents for dental use; Separating agents used in dentistry in the molding of crown and bridge castings and of denture bases to facilitate removal thereof from the mold; Medicines for dental purposes, namely, medicines for the treatment of periodontitis and toothaches, desensitizing agents for tooth hypersensitivity, and diagnostic agents for dental useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 14, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 24, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 18, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 18, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 26, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 17, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 2, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 26, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 18, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2008RGOAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION—
Aug 18, 2008RFRRREQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance