USPTO serial 79046846
C 200
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3512809Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2008
- Examiner
- BUJA, SANDRA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with C 200?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Index-Werke GmbH & Co. KG Hahn & Tessky
DE
Other trademarks owned by Index-Werke GmbH & Co. KG Hahn & Tessky
Index-Werke GmbH & Co. KG Hahn & Tessky
DE
Other trademarks owned by Index-Werke GmbH & Co. KG Hahn & Tessky
Index-Werke GmbH & Co. KG Hahn & Tessky
Esslingen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Index-Werke GmbH & Co. KG Hahn & Tessky
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas M. McAllister
Douglas M. McAllister Lipsitz & McAllister, LLC755 Main Street, Building 8Monroe, CT 06468UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Index-Werke GmbH & Co. KG Hahn & Tessky
- Other trademarks owned by Index-Werke GmbH & Co. KG Hahn & Tessky
- Other trademarks owned by Index-Werke GmbH & Co. KG Hahn & Tessky
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named C 200
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2019 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 7, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 24, 2014 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |