Drawing for IMARC

USPTO serial 79046860

IMARC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3547069Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 16, 2008
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with IMARC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Groos

Richard J. Groos King & Spalding LLP500 West 2nd Street, 1800Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal furniture fittings in the nature of office chair fittings, namely, metal tilting mechanisms in the nature of metal hinges and metal locking mechanisms, metal permanent contact mechanisms consisting of metal hinges and metal locking mechanisms, metal synchronized mechanisms consisting of metal hinges and metal locking mechanisms, metal slides for seat depth adjustment, and metal foot rings in the nature of ring-shaped fittings of metal; Metal structures, namely, metal frames for office and community chairs and benches [ ; Metal structures for tables, namely, metal trestles for use as table supports ]ACTIVE—
020Office chair components not of metal, namely, nylon bases, armrest covers [, plastic seats and backs ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 4, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 21, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 8, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 12, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 23, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 23, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 3, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 28, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 16, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 12, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 23, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 23, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 8, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 7, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance