Drawing for MONTE-BIANCO

USPTO serial 79046862

MONTE-BIANCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3505591Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 23, 2008
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONTE-BIANCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAREN LIM

KAREN LIM FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Millstones; grindstones; (( electric polishing machines for use in grinding and polishing metal, wood, ceramics and plastics; )) mining drill sharpeners; cutting machines; electric knives; machine parts, namely, blades; power operated sharpeners; stropping machines, namely, power operated knife sharpeners; tools, namely, diamond-pointed metal cutting tools; apparatus for dressing, namely, machines utilizing rotational motion for high energy surface finishing and material treatment; glaziers' diamonds, namely, power operated diamond-pointed glass cutting toolsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 23, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 26, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 26, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 24, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
May 30, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 30, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED—
Sep 30, 201415AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Sep 30, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 24, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 17, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2014E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 31, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance