USPTO serial 79046919
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DE
HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG
HUGO BOSS; Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by HUGO BOSS; Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG
HUGO BOSS; Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by HUGO BOSS; Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Conklin
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery [ and cosmetic ] preparations, namely, [ perfumes, eau de parfum, ] eau de toilette [ aftershave, body, hand and skin cleansers, namely, toilet soaps, soaps for body care, shower gels, bath gels and skin cleansers; body, hand and skin lotions and creams; essential oils for personal use; and deodorants for personal use ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |