Drawing for MASTRA

USPTO serial 79046934

MASTRA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3635442Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 9, 2009
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MASTRA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy T. Wang

Timothy T. Wang Ni, Wang & Massand PLLC8140 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 500Dallas, TX 75231UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Motors, namely, alternating current motors, not for land vehicles; motors, namely, synchronous motors, not for land vehicles; fuel pumps for land vehicles; oil pumps for land vehicles; submersible pumps; centrifugal pumps; compressed air pumps; electric pumps; oil drain pumps; windmill pumps; water pumps for land vehicles; water pumps for use in motors and enginesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2019CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 5, 2019CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 4, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 11, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2018RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 24, 2015NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 201571AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 20, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 16, 2015ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 7, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 9, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 9, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 4, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2009PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2009ISPOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - PETITIONS OFFICE REQUEST—
Dec 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 18, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2008RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 7, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance