Drawing for SYPRO OPTICS

USPTO serial 79046947

SYPRO OPTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3602666Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 7, 2009
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYPRO OPTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina M. Hillson, Esquire

Christina M. Hillson, Esquire Barnes & Thornburg LLP1000 N. West Street, Suite 1500Wilmington, DE 19801-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific and optical apparatus and instruments, namely, optical modules consisting primarily of illumination optics, namely, light-emitting diodes, lamps, lasers, lenses, and illumination regulators with adjustable light transferring elements, namely, filters, mirrors, and diffusers; projection optics, namely, optical lenses; optical engines consisting of optical module, color management elements, and light source and image producing elements for use in digital projectors, micro display televisions, camera modules, video wall projection devices and other optical applications, and complete projection devices consisting of optical engines, control electronics, interfaces and housing, namely, digital projectorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Research and development in the field of optical and opto-mechanical technologies and the manufacturing of optical and opto-mechanical products, namely, optical lenses, digital projectors, microdisplay televisions and cameras; design of optical lenses, digital projectors, microdisplay televisions and cameras; engineering and scientific and technological consultation services in the field of optical and opto-mechanical technologies and the manufacturing of optical and opto-mechanical products, namely, optical lenses, digital projectors, microdisplay televisions and camerasSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 18, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 21, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 14, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 13, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 17, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 17, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 23, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 7, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 2, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 17, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 21, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 21, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 25, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 25, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 1, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 31, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance