Drawing for BARUFFALDI

USPTO serial 79046961

BARUFFALDI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BARUFFALDI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, machine tools and their parts; friction clutches; brakes, couplings and transmissions of all type and their parts; tool-holder turrets and cutting dies; automatic self-centring chucks and tailstock centers for machine toolsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Friction clutches, joints, couplings, transmissions and their parts for vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
037Construction and repair servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 9, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 13, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 14, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2009OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2009OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2008RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 21, 2008RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2008RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 21, 2008RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance